In this programme, students will acquire the skills to independently study and learn. The task of the teachers is to provide students with a suitable framework and set the proper conditions for learning. Teachers will expect you to deal with the tasks assigned and invest time as needed. Learning ‘how to learn’ is an essential competence that you will need to develop throughout your studies.
How to develop skills around learning and research has been expanded upon by thinkers such the theologian and philosopher Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834). The German magazine Forschung & Lehre (Research & Teaching), or F&L, explores this topic in a fictional interview with Schleiermacher:
F&L: ‘Universities have a variety of responsibilities, such as training students for the global labour market and producing research that can be used to improve different industries. But what is the main task of a university in terms of developing its students?’
Friedrich Schleiermacher: ‘Ideally, the university initiates a process for students, namely the initiation of a new intellectual process that students can adopt and apply to their daily lives. The university should awaken the idea of science within students, so that it becomes second nature to look at everything from an objective and scientific point of view–especially anything within the students’ field or within any academic disciplines they study. The university should train students to look at topics independently, but also to see the scientific connections in a larger context. Universities can help students become aware of the basic laws of science in every thought, and precisely by doing so to assist with skills around research, public presentations, and to gradually work out for themselves the business of the university.’
(Grigat, Felix (2018). Friedrich Schleiermacher: Auf die Vorlesung kommt es an. Forschung & Lehre. Alles was die Wissenschaft bewegt. 20.11.2018) To the original text
At the BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg there is no obligation to attend university lectures, seminars, or events. In studying the humanities and social sciences, learning takes place mainly through discussion and presentation. Therefore, logical thinking, thought development, and the presentation of arguments are developed through repetitive practice. That is why we place great emphasis on your participation in events, even if attendance is not mandatory.
Please arrive punctually, do not let yourself be distracted by food or your phone during lectures, and use the presence of your fellow students and the lecturer for concentrated thinking and active speech participation. You will also notice in good time whether you have understood the topics covered and to what extent they are in line with your own research interests. If you do not understand a theme or concept, ask your lecturer for clarification and discuss it with your fellow students.
You can also involve your lecturer or fellow students in the preparation of your written work. If you use something from these discussions or written comments from the lecturer directly in your paper(s), make sure you clearly cite the source of information. This also applies to other written sources that you use for your work from which you quote or paraphrase literally.
Attempts to deceive in written works, or plagiarism, are quite easy to identify. Style breaks, incoherent use of words as terms, and erratic reasoning are just some ways to identify plagiarism. Before you take the trouble to conceal them, we recommend that you invest time in developing your own text.
Below are some of the most important rules you need to follow to make your paper a work in its own right. Failure to follow these rules will be seen as an attempt at deception and your work will be treated as plagiarism.
All sources used must be fully identified so that they can be found and understood by other readers. Please observe the following customs of professional and academic writing culture:
- Literal quotations must be placed in quotation marks and the source must be indicated in parentheses at the end of the sentence useing the text and/or quote; this applies to terms, expressions, phrases and sections of text.
- If you paraphrase another text, i.e. reproduce the meaning in your own words, the source must be indicated in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
- At the end of your work you must include a complete list of all sources used (bibliography). This applies to almost all types of literature that you will deal with in the course of your studies with us (exception, for example, the essay).
- Sentences like ‘Immanuel Kant was an important philosopher of the Enlightenment’ are sentences that belong to the basic knowledge and do not have to be provided with a source.
- If you take a quotation from another author without checking the original source, it is a secondary source. This must also be cited.
If you comply with the following rules, you can hand in your written work with a clear conscience.
- Always clearly distinguish between your own thoughts and the thoughts of others.
- Clearly cite all authors and paraphrased sources used in your text.
- List all sources used (Internet, pictures, tables, codes, data, graphics) in the bibliography.
- Observe the citation standards as required by the chair.
- Attach your signed declaration of independence.
If an external work is partially or completely taken from a source or author without any citation or reference, this is deemed plagiarism. The University of Zurich’s student magazine defines plagiarism as when:
- The author submits a work created by another under his name (‘ghostwriting’).
- The author submits another work under his name (full plagiarism).
- The author submits one and the same work (or parts thereof) to various examinations or seminar occasions (self-plagiarism).
- The author translates foreign-language texts or parts of foreign-language texts and presents them as their own work without citing the translation source (translation plagiarism).
- The author uses parts of a text from an outside source without identifying the source with a citation. This also includes the downloading and using of text excerpts from the Internet (copy & paste plagiarism).
- The author uses text from an outside source, makes slight adjustments and changes to the text (paraphrasing), but does not identify the source with a citation.
- The author uses text from an outside source, paraphrases it if necessary, and provides a citation, but does not cite it in the properly corresponding part of the text (example: hiding the plagiarized source in a footnote at the end of the work).
(Christian Schwarzenegger & Wolfgang Wohlers. Plagiatsformen und disziplinarrechtliche Konsequenzen. Unijournal 4 (2006), S. 3) To the original text
Please see BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg rules and regulations under General Examination and Study Regulations (§ 20 (4)):
‘If a student attempts to influence his or her result by deception or use of inadmissible tools, if he or she is part of a deception or if he or she disturbs the orderly course of the examination or, if for the purpose of conscious deception of intellectual property of others is violated or published material of third parties is used without mentioning the sources or authors and submitted as own performance (plagiarism), the examination performance concerned will be graded “insufficient” (5.0) and the examinee can be excluded from continuation of the examination by the examiner. In severe cases or in case of reoccurrence the responsible Examination Board decides on the loss of examination right.’
The Statue for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice at the BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg as of 2 March 2018 is to ensure that good research practices are observed by both scientific staff and students.
- The student will be asked to sit for an interview with the seminar leader or professor.
- The student is told that he or she has plagiarised and is attempting to deceive. The interview is recorded.
- The work is given a grade of 5 (insufficient).
- The grade is passed on to the student service, including the note ‘attempted deception’.
- The process is reported to the responsible examination board.
It has become fashionable nowadays to regard writing books as the ultimate purpose of study, which is why so many study to write instead studying to know.
You are studying at a time when independent learning and the acquisition of knowledge is not a matter of course. Instead, in many study programmes, studying is seen as a kind of introduction to one’s career and professional life. Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, an intellectual from the Age of Enlightenment, critically notes on the acquisition of knowledge this in his Sudelbücher series. He perhaps would described today’s learning methods as the training of marketable knowledge.
Of course, there is nothing to be said against thinking about securing one’s future at an early stage, where the period of study is more like a kind of prelude to professional life. However, the activity of studying itself can be regarded as its own profession. Studying follows its own rules and takes place in a certain social and institutional context. What you learn during your studies is fundamentally different from what you learn when you have found your profession—or your current profession. Learning refers to an activity that you acquire during your studies and that you will continue to practice throughout your life. In this sense, our ethos of studying is an introduction to professional learning at the university.
During their studies, students are expected to act in a manner based on virtues such as mutual respect, duty, and responsibility. Think, for example, of the distinction between one’s own and others’ intellectual property or the punctual and prepared participation in seminars.
Beyond this practice of living habits, there are other facets of the ethos of a ‘spiritual work as a profession’, as the cultural and social scientist Max Weber explained in his series of lectures in 1917/18 at the invitation of the ‘Deutsche Freien Studentenschaft’, as part of an academic reform movement. Among other things, Weber deals with the question of what distinguishes scientific knowledge from other forms of knowledge and what consequences this has for professional understanding. He suggests that this knowledge is particularly ‘worth knowing’ because it is based on the virtue of intellectual righteousness. It is this virtue, characterized at its core by duty, clarity and a sense of responsibility, which helps the individual ‘to give himself an account of the ultimate meaning of his own actions’ (Weber, Max (1991)). Science as a profession (8th edition). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, p. 32) For more information, see the original text.
Weber’s reflections on ‘science as a profession’, the social and societal impact of universities, are still being discussed today. Literary scholar Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht takes this up in his essay on the "Task of the Humanities Today" (Ders. (2012). Presence. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 145-168). He interprets Weber’s writing above as a thesis on the objectivity of scientific research, which consists in the production of innovative thinking. This could also confront ‘unpleasant truths’, but ultimately confirms the social effectiveness of the university in its potential for change.
All these considerations above are an offer and invitation for you to think about what it means for you to conduct your studies in an ethical and professional manner—what consequences could this have for your individual development and for the development of society?
Having an environment of ethics and good conduct at the university include having regulations to ensure good scientific practice, avoid plagiarism, prevent conflict, and ensure that there is gender equality in the professional environment. At BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, there are departments for all the mentioned areas areas. Confidential persons are available to assist you if you have problems with lecturers, fellow students or are seeking help for personal problems. On a personal level, this means that you internalise the rules of good scientific practice and develop a keen sense of what your own ideas are and what you owe to other thinkers.
The institution of higher education is an environment onto itself, and possibly each university could be seen as its own microcosm with its own culture. The organisation of the student body and its teachers, the names of the administrative units, study and examination regulations—all these relevant places and documents—can be different in each case. Identify who is the right contact person for what, e.g. student service and programme management for organisational questions, the chairs for content questions, the student council for practical questions. Read the examination and study regulations relevant to your chosen degree programme and find out about the composition of your curriculum, the module and course descriptions, and also the teaching and research areas of the chairs involved in your degree programme. Also take care of the BTU’s event pages, where student and academic activities beyond your own subject or degree programme are advertised.
There are great similarities between universities in terms of quality assurance of academic staff and academic roles. In principle, the ‘Homo academicus’ (Pierre Bourdieu (1984) Homo academicus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp) passes through a career from bachelor’s and master’s degrees and in most subjects, as an academic assistant, to doctorate or habilitation. In the natural sciences, so-called cumulative doctorates and habilitations are common; in philosophy, for example, ‘a second book’ is written as a habilitation. In artistic subjects and architecture, an academic career does not necessarily require a doctorate or even habilitation. Chairs (also at BTU) are filled by means of a call for tenders and a competitive appointment procedure (Univ.Prof., Prof. FH, Jun.Prof.); in addition, there are internal university procedures without a call for tenders (substitute professors; extraordinary professors (apl. Prof.) and honorary professors are either not employed at all or not employed as professors). Guest professors are hired without a selection procedure for a certain period of time; their main purpose is usually to stimulate research. At BTU, there are about 183 professors and 652 academic staff (as of March 2019, cf. Facts and figures).